CCD-world: EEv 4220 sensors.

P.Oates at rl.ac.uk P.Oates at rl.ac.uk
Mon Sep 20 11:28:38 CLT 1999


The following was posted to CCD-world:

Hi all
   I have to now admit that I am erm.... back in circulation. After almost 9
months of 'doing my own thing' and enjoying it!! I decided I better knuckle
down and start paying the mortgage again. So 
I accepted a post at the UK Rutherford Appleton Lab, working with Nick
Waltham.... I have been here 6 weeks and am sort of getting settled in . I
have been lurking round the CCD group all along - from home but not taking
part.... Well I thought I better earn my bread and respond Michel's query
about EEv chips.
	As you know we, and others, tried a lot of EEV4210 and 4280 @ RGO
before its demise. The gain was NOT dependent on coating but WAS dependent
on whether it was a front-side or back-side device. This difference was
explained to us by the guys at EEV as being due to the extra parasitic
capacitance's with the BS devices. The lowest noise we saw was around 1.5e
@5-6e/uV on this early FS device. The BS devices were all around 2ish
electrons and about 4ish uV/e
	Are you manipulating the oH2 clock as this is used as a 'gain
control. It should be 1V higher than 0H1 which itself should be 1V higher
than H clock low. Putting oH2 at +3V changed our gains ( and hence noise) by
a factor of 2 or 3 (i.e. 12uV/e and 10e noise - if I recall correctly)

Does this help

Asta la vista, live long and prosper...

Paddy

-----Original Message-----
From: C.GUILLAUME [mailto:guillaume at obs-hp.fr]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 1999 5:15 PM
To: CCD-world at astro.ku.dk
Cc: Michel goillandeau
Subject: CCD-world: EEv 4220 sensors.


The following was posted to CCD-world:

Dear all;

Planning to build new astro cameras a couple of years ago,
we have got 4220 CCd models (2 grade 0 for final camera and
one electrical grade for evaluation tests).
The difference between the astro chips and the electrical one is:
Astro models are coated while electrical is not.
All the tests were made with the electrical chip in standard EEV
preconized polarisation voltages; i.e  Vss =+9v a.s.o...
We could verify the output gain which was 4.3uv/e-.
but, we met a noise problem due to our ground system;
difficult to solve. So we decided to change polarisation voltages
and to put Vss=0v. At OHP, we used to polarize our CCd that way,
 and we never found problems .

 After consulting EEV engineers who told us
that ift was not forbidden provide the other voltages and clocks level
should be drawn downward of about 9v. And the output resistor load
should be set so that the output current stays in a good value.
EEV alos said that noise could be increased using that scheme polar;
because the ADC noise induced in the ground circuit.
So we modified all voltages as invited by EEV.

In fact it was not exactely what we observed. The noise has dramatically
 fallen , rather nice ! But we forgott to verify the output gain....
Then , since we had observed a very good noise ( remember it was an
electrical chip !), we have replaced the electrical chip by the astro one.

But we observed that the output gain has been reduced to about 3uv/e-.
We have tried a lot of solutions, but no one induced a good result and the
output gain stays at 3uv/e-.

So our question is :  Does the fact of setting Vss at ground (0v), meaning
also that it is at the same potential than output amplifier  load ,affect
the
output gain in so great proportions ?

Since we have obseved the same behavour between the electrical chip and
the two astro ones , is there a great difference between  non coated and
coated chips?

Does coating affect the outpu gain?

We Have found no litterature on the ccd-world forum , about this phenomenon
that is why we send you this mail.

Thank you for your help ,

Best regards.


 -----------------------------
¦ Christian  GUILLAUME
¦ Service Electronique
¦   CNRS / IGRAP                                 Tel: (33).04.92.70.64.09
¦ Observatoire de Haute Provence         Fax: (33).04.92.70.64.64
¦ 04870 St Michel l'Observatoire        Email: guillaume at obs-hp.fr
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
- -- CCD-world -- --
CCD-world is fully moderated. Send posts to CCD-world at astro.ku.dk
Standard replies will go to the list; address personal replies manually.
For more information, please go to:  http://www.not.iac.es/CCD-world/
- -- CCD-world -- --
CCD-world is fully moderated. Send posts to CCD-world at astro.ku.dk
Standard replies will go to the list; address personal replies manually.
For more information, please go to:  http://www.not.iac.es/CCD-world/



More information about the CCD-world mailing list